Pat’s Pools v. Desi Dazzle and Delgado Pool Architects is a contract dispute case file revolving around noncompete contract clauses. When star salesperson Desi Dazzle left Pat’s Pools for Delgado, the ripple effect was massive. Delgado snagged a lucrative deal with Mega Builders—over 200 pools in a new community—while Pat’s was left high and dry despite a signed letter of intent with Mega Builders. Hotels followed suit, taking their maintenance business to Delgado to keep working with Dazzle. 

Pat’s claims Dazzle violated nonsolicitation, nondisclosure, and noncompetition clauses. Delgado fires back, arguing the clauses don’t hold up under the law. It’s a battle of contracts, ethics, and competitive strategy. 

Bring this case to your trial advocacy curriculum and watch participants dive into real-world challenges with enthusiasm. 

Professors and students will benefit from:

• Fast-Paced & Accessible—Under 100 pages, easy to grasp.
• Balanced & Engaging—Four lay witnesses and two optional experts keep it lively. 
• Perfect for Trial Advocacy—Entertaining, realistic, and ready for classroom or program use.