{"product_id":"brett-general-contracting-llc-v-the-school-board-of-nita-county-first-edition","title":"Brett General Contracting, LLC v. The School Board of Nita County, First Edition","description":"\u003cp\u003eBring real-world complexity into your program with this richly layered civil contract case designed for \u003cb\u003etrial advocacy, mock trial, and advanced civil litigation courses\u003c\/b\u003e. This construction contract dispute between a long-standing government contractor and a county school board places participants squarely at the intersection of \u003cb\u003econtract interpretation, public-entity defenses, and evidentiary nuance\u003c\/b\u003e. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003ePlaintiff Brett General Contracting, LLC alleges breach of contract and bad faith after the School Board of Nita County (SBNC) refused to pay delay-related change order costs. SBNC denies liability, asserts sovereign immunity, and countersues for breach of contract. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eThe case centers on a \u003cb\u003e“no damages for delay”\u003c\/b\u003e clause, alleged exceptions to that clause, and disputed promises made by multiple project managers—some oral, some written, and some allegedly never approved. Participants must navigate burdens of proof, affirmative defenses, and a counterclaim, all before a civil jury. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003eKey Learning Areas \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eContract interpretation and “no damages for delay” clauses \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExceptions, waiver, reliance, and course of dealing \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBad faith claims requiring willful or intentional conduct \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSovereign immunity and limits on employee authority \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eCompeting burdens of proof, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003eProfessors and students will benefit from: \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReady‑to‑teach materials that save preparation time, including teaching notes and a detailed factual timeline \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSample excerpts from deposition videos for reviewing questioning techniques \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eVarious forms of evidence including social media, text, email, and voicemail recording \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eBuilt‑in pedagogical complexity, allowing instructors to focus on advocacy skills rather than inventing factual nuance \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eClear assessment opportunities for openings, witness examinations, evidentiary objections, and closings \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePractice applying burdens of proof, affirmative defenses, and counterclaims in a jury trial setting \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eSkill development in case theory, credibility assessment, and strategic use of documents and testimony \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eExposure to bad faith standards, sovereign immunity, and public‑entity litigation issues \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eReal‑world legal ambiguity, requiring judgment calls rather than rote rule application \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":51833845678360,"sku":"9798886691825","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_a2254bdb-6073-4b5d-95d9-9e050ab2f7c1.jpg?v=1781674129","url":"https:\/\/aspenpublishing.com\/products\/brett-general-contracting-llc-v-the-school-board-of-nita-county-first-edition","provider":"Aspen Publishing","version":"1.0","type":"link"}