{"title":"NITA Case Files","description":"","products":[{"product_id":"nita-zwier-lidefendant3","title":"Douglas Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc.: Defendants' Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eIn Doug Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc., the plaintiff, a Chinese-American, claims he had a significant business relationship with Michelle Greenwood and that the defendant, his brother-in-law, improperly interfered with that relationship by making a series of improper and false statements about the quality of his work. As a result of these statements, the plaintiff claims that Greenwood broke off her relationship with him and instead gave the contract to the defendant's company, Ross Construction Company. The plaintiff also believes that the defendant not only bears a personal grudge, but an ethnic bias as well.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866117198104,"sku":"9781601564320","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_d465af86-f051-4a91-85e8-e5f9d0dfa268.jpg?v=1785734517"},{"product_id":"nita-zwier-lifaculty3","title":"Douglas Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc.: Faculty Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eIn Doug Li v. John Ross and Ross Construction Co., Inc., the plaintiff, a Chinese-American, claims he had a significant business relationship with Michelle Greenwood and that the defendant, his brother-in-law, improperly interfered with that relationship by making a series of improper and false statements about the quality of his work. As a result of these statements, the plaintiff claims that Greenwood broke off her relationship with him and instead gave the contract to the defendant's company, Ross Construction Company. The plaintiff also believes that the defendant not only bears a personal grudge, but an ethnic bias as well.  There are three witnesses for the plaintiff and five witnesses for the defendant. The case file deals with issues of tortious interference with a contract, tortious interference with prospective economic advantage, slander, and punitive damages and contains ample material for motion practice.  This third edition also contains new social media exhibits. It is available in four versions: Trial, Faculty, Plaintiff, and Defendant.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866117263640,"sku":"9781601564337","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_a39b768c-c910-41e8-9350-8d676dff3721.jpg?v=1785734519"},{"product_id":"nita-boals-addison3","title":"Addison v. Peyton: Case File, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eBuilding contractor Taylor Addison suffered severe first- and second-degree burns when someone sideswiped her parked car. The impact spilled scalding coffee over her left hand, leaving her slightly scarred. In this civil case version of \u003ci\u003eState v. Peyton\u003c\/i\u003e, Addison has filed a complaint against Jordan Peyton alleging negligence and negligence per se. Addison further alleges that Peyton operated her car in an unsafe manner while under the influence of alcohol and struck Addison's car causing the coffee she was holding to spill over onto her hand, which resulted in severe burns. Is the damage on Peyton’s car proof of a collision with Addison’s, or merely coincidence? How do the field sobriety tests and BAC evidence influence the determination on whether Peyton hit Addison’s car? Was Peyton’s arrest and breathalyzer test mishandled? Advocates will enjoy working either side of this well-balanced case.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNew to the Third Edition: \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866120474904,"sku":"9781601569509","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_093473dd-4bd4-4306-986d-b7107bb1a5b1.jpg?v=1785734530"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-ahmedvbuckner3-defendant","title":"Ahmed v. Buckner and Cooper \u0026 Stewart, LLC: Deposition File, Defendant's Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKiya Ahmed had an affair with her married boss, Paul Buckner. After that relationship soured, Kiya was denied partnership at Cooper \u0026amp; Stewart, the accounting firm where she and Paul both worked. Kiya claims discrimination and retaliation caused the denial. The defendants say that her inconsistent job performance lead to their decision. Who is right? This well-balanced case file can be won by either party.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhmed v. Buckner is the new incarnation of the popular case file Polisi v. Clark. The defendant business is now an accounting firm, rather than a law firm. Updated exhibits include computer records, text messages, and emails, allowing lawyers to practice their skills in laying foundations. The deposition file has three witnesses for each side. The trial version includes two additional expert witnesses and their reports. Whether they are law students or practiced lawyers, this engaging case file will hone participants’ advocacy skills.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866122965272,"sku":"9781601568472","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_58b085eb-f5b7-437e-a7dd-7f53f27307c0.jpg?v=1785734531"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-ahmedvbuckner3-faculty","title":"Ahmed v. Buckner and Cooper \u0026 Stewart, LLC: Deposition File, Faculty Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKiya Ahmed had an affair with her married boss, Paul Buckner. After that relationship soured, Kiya was denied partnership at Cooper \u0026amp; Stewart, the accounting firm where she and Paul both worked. Kiya claims discrimination and retaliation caused the denial. The defendants say that her inconsistent job performance lead to their decision. Who is right? This well-balanced case file can be won by either party.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhmed v. Buckner is the new incarnation of the popular case file Polisi v. Clark. The defendant business is now an accounting firm, rather than a law firm. Updated exhibits include computer records, text messages, and emails, allowing lawyers to practice their skills in laying foundations. The deposition file has three witnesses for each side. The trial version includes two additional expert witnesses and their reports. Whether they are law students or practiced lawyers, this engaging case file will hone participants advocacy skills.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866122998040,"sku":"9781601568434","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_95fe4ce6-8b8b-4bbf-a6c9-9e9f7f50c6b3.jpg?v=1785734532"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-ahmedvbuckner3-plaintiff","title":"Ahmed v. Buckner and Cooper \u0026 Stewart, LLC: Deposition File, Plaintiff's Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKiya Ahmed had an affair with her married boss, Paul Buckner. After that relationship soured, Kiya was denied partnership at Cooper \u0026amp; Stewart, the accounting firm where she and Paul both worked. Kiya claims discrimination and retaliation caused the denial. The defendants say that her inconsistent job performance lead to their decision. Who is right? This well-balanced case file can be won by either party.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhmed v. Buckner is the new incarnation of the popular case file Polisi v. Clark. The defendant business is now an accounting firm, rather than a law firm. Updated exhibits include computer records, text messages, and emails, allowing lawyers to practice their skills in laying foundations. The deposition file has three witnesses for each side. The trial version includes two additional expert witnesses and their reports. Whether they are law students or practiced lawyers, this engaging case file will hone participants’ advocacy skills.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866123063576,"sku":"9781601568458","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_d999d90b-60d3-494b-a6be-9540a86964ad.jpg?v=1785734532"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-ahmedvbuckner3-trial","title":"Ahmed v. Buckner and Cooper \u0026 Stewart, LLC: Case File, Trial Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eKiya Ahmed had an affair with her married boss, Paul Buckner. After that relationship soured, Kiya was denied partnership at Cooper \u0026amp; Stewart, the accounting firm where she and Paul both worked. Kiya claims discrimination and retaliation caused the denial. The defendants say that her inconsistent job performance lead to their decision. Who is right? This well-balanced case file can be won by either party.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAhmed v. Buckner is the new incarnation of the popular case file Polisi v. Clark. The defendant business is now an accounting firm, rather than a law firm. Updated exhibits include computer records, text messages, and emails, allowing lawyers to practice their skills in laying foundations. The deposition file has three witnesses for each side. The trial version includes two additional expert witnesses and their reports. Whether they are law students or practiced lawyers, this engaging case file will hone participants’ advocacy skills.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866123096344,"sku":"9781601568410","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_1901cacf-dbd2-489b-8780-4841683eca0b.jpg?v=1785734530"},{"product_id":"nita-schepard-allen2","title":"Allen v. Allen: Case File, Trial Materials, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e describes the legal, emotional, and economic challenges a family of four faces during a divorce. The parents, Lynne and David Allen, each seek decision-making authority and primary residence of their two adolescent children, while also disputing the valuation and division of their marital assets.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe complexities that accompany family reorganization necessitated by divorce and the unique nature of family law litigation require interdisciplinary knowledge and the understanding and cooperation of lawyers, mediators, mental health experts, and financial experts. This second edition of \u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e takes place in an interdisciplinary setting to allow professionals to work together to protect the rights, needs, and interests of their clients and children.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe case file features five witnesses (i.e., a court-appointed, neutral expert psychologist; valuation experts for both sides; husband and wife), exhibits, depositions, expert reports and evaluations, and social media evidence (Facebook posts, emails, and text messages). The parenting plan and business valuation disputes can be tried separately or together; each will challenge the learner’s advocacy and examination skills.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866123194648,"sku":"9781601568212","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_7c6d29a2-2a3a-4f47-ab91-66585b9d318e.jpg?v=1785734529"},{"product_id":"nita-allenvallen2-client","title":"Allen v. Allen: Client Counseling, Negotiation, and Mediation Advocacy in Divorce Disputes, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis file is designed to develop the out-of-court representational skills of present and future divorce lawyers. It focuses on the case of \u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e and the divorce lawyer’s role in representing a client in the negotiation and mediation of the Allen’s divorce dispute. This file stresses the link between counseling a client, negotiation on behalf of a client, and representing a client at the mediation session.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis counseling, negotiation, and mediation representation file is a companion to a trial case file and a depositions case file with the same name and family. The trial file and depositions file focus on advocacy skills in divorce disputes that cannot be resolved through mediation or negotiation.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866123325720,"sku":"9781601568748","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_f8bdd1b0-248d-4544-95ea-d95447fb7a3a.jpg?v=1785734534"},{"product_id":"nita-allenvallen2-faculty","title":"Allen v. Allen: Deposition File, Faculty Materials, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e describes the legal, emotional, and economic challenges a family of four faces during a divorce. The parents, Lynne and David Allen, each seek decision-making authority and primary residence of their two adolescent children, while also disputing the valuation and division of their marital assets.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe complexities that accompany family reorganization necessitated by divorce and the unique nature of family law litigation require interdisciplinary knowledge and the understanding and cooperation of lawyers, mediators, mental health experts, and financial experts. This second edition of \u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e takes place in an interdisciplinary setting to allow professionals to work together to protect the rights, needs, and interests of their clients and children.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe case file features five witnesses (i.e., a court-appointed, neutral expert psychologist; valuation experts for both sides; husband and wife), exhibits, depositions, expert reports and evaluations, and social media evidence (Facebook posts, emails, and text messages). The parenting plan and business valuation disputes can be tried separately or together; each will challenge the learner’s advocacy and examination skills.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866123456792,"sku":"9781601568199","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_42ddce61-5f30-460f-b706-f55275f73ba0.jpg?v=1785734581"},{"product_id":"nita-allenvallen2-petitioner","title":"Allen v. Allen: Deposition File, Petitioner's Materials, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e describes the legal, emotional, and economic challenges a family of four faces during a divorce. The parents, Lynne and David Allen, each seek decision-making authority and primary residence of their two adolescent children, while also disputing the valuation and division of their marital assets.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe complexities that accompany family reorganization necessitated by divorce and the unique nature of family law litigation require interdisciplinary knowledge and the understanding and cooperation of lawyers, mediators, mental health experts, and financial experts. This second edition of \u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e takes place in an interdisciplinary setting to allow professionals to work together to protect the rights, needs, and interests of their clients and children.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe case file features five witnesses (i.e., a court-appointed, neutral expert psychologist; valuation experts for both sides; husband and wife), exhibits, depositions, expert reports and evaluations, and social media evidence (Facebook posts, emails, and text messages). The parenting plan and business valuation disputes can be tried separately or together; each will challenge the learner’s advocacy and examination skills.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866123620632,"sku":"9781601568151","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_77749838-d008-4f6c-80c0-06bfafce9932.jpg?v=1785734580"},{"product_id":"nita-allenvallen2-respondent","title":"Allen v. Allen: Deposition File, Respondent's Materials, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e describes the legal, emotional, and economic challenges a family of four faces during a divorce. The parents, Lynne and David Allen, each seek decision-making authority and primary residence of their two adolescent children, while also disputing the valuation and division of their marital assets.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe complexities that accompany family reorganization necessitated by divorce and the unique nature of family law litigation require interdisciplinary knowledge and the understanding and cooperation of lawyers, mediators, mental health experts, and financial experts. This second edition of \u003ci\u003eAllen v. Allen\u003c\/i\u003e takes place in an interdisciplinary setting to allow professionals to work together to protect the rights, needs, and interests of their clients and children.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe case file features five witnesses (i.e., a court-appointed, neutral expert psychologist; valuation experts for both sides; husband and wife), exhibits, depositions, expert reports and evaluations, and social media evidence (Facebook posts, emails, and text messages). The parenting plan and business valuation disputes can be tried separately or together; each will challenge the learner’s advocacy and examination skills.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866123653400,"sku":"9781601568175","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_327e0a88-ede9-4328-a20e-b437547eac6d.jpg?v=1785734579"},{"product_id":"nita-stern-avila","title":"Avila v. Nita City Hospital: Case File, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eA bout of meningitis leaves 2-year-old Timmy profoundly deaf. His mother sues the hospital, alleging that neglectful care and a slow diagnosis directly caused Timmy’s deafness. The hospital counters that the proper standard of care was met and Timmy’s deafness was unfortunate but unavoidable. Who is right? That’s the challenge for this well-balanced, lively case. The case presents a wealth of expert testimony, both medical and economic. A total of eight expert reports, four for each side, are provided. Experts can all be used, or if the class has a shorter time frame can be limited. Electronic materials, in the form of texts and social media, provide exercises in foundation building for these modern exhibits. The affidavits in Avila v. The Nita City Hospital are engaging, with well-rounded personalities that volunteers will enjoy roleplaying. As in real life, the case is filled with challenging evidence problems—is the prior assault allegation against the doctor relevant? Is the mother’s misdemeanor neglect? Are all the media exhibits relevant? Participants will have to decide what to pursue, and how to build a foundation for each exhibit. With its realistic exhibits and professional appearance, Avila creates an immersive experience that all participants, students and instructors, will enjoy.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866126471448,"sku":"9781601567550","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_fc704a43-6e53-4df4-a307-a7d9df979bfd.jpg?v=1785734505"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-bmivminicom11r-defendants","title":"BMI v. Minicom, Deposition File, Defendant’s Materials, Eleventh Edition","description":"\u003cp\u003e It’s David versus Goliath when computer giant BMI sues startup Minicom for damages when a shipment of components that BMI sent to Minicom is lost. BMI claims that Minicom bore the risk of loss; it is suing to recover for breach of contract. Minicom claims it directed BMI to obtain insurance on the shipment and that BMI’s failure to do so breached the contract, causing the loss of past and future profits. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e One of NITA’s most popular cases, this well-balanced file has been updated with electronic evidence. BMI provides ample material for basic and advanced advocacy training with two witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant in the deposition version. The trial version includes one optional economics expert for each side. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e BMI is available as a trial file, or as deposition files with Plaintiff, Defendant, and Faculty versions, each sold separately. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNew to the Revised 11th Edition: \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e Updated exhibits to correct dates and eliminate confusion \u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cb\u003eProfessors and students will benefit from:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A case file that can be used both for deposition practice and for mock trials \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A time-tested case file that has been updated to include electronic exhibits \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866129912088,"sku":"9781601569899","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_49070788-262e-48e8-8c65-aee80fb8ecf1.jpg?v=1785734537"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-bmivminicom11r-faculty","title":"BMI v. Minicom: Deposition File, Faculty Materials, Eleventh Edition","description":"\u003cp\u003e It’s David versus Goliath when computer giant BMI sues startup Minicom for damages when a shipment of components that BMI sent to Minicom is lost. BMI claims that Minicom bore the risk of loss; it is suing to recover for breach of contract. Minicom claims it directed BMI to obtain insurance on the shipment and that BMI’s failure to do so breached the contract, causing the loss of past and future profits. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e One of NITA’s most popular cases, this well-balanced file has been updated with electronic evidence. BMI provides ample material for basic and advanced advocacy training with two witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant in the deposition version. The trial version includes one optional economics expert for each side. BMI is available as a trial file, or as deposition files with Plaintiff, Defendant, and Faculty versions, each sold separately. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNew to the Revised 11th Edition:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e Updated exhibits to correct dates and eliminate confusion \u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cp\u003e   \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cb\u003eProfessors and students will benefit from:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A case file that can be used both for deposition practice and for mock trials \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A time-tested case file that has been updated to include electronic exhibits \u003cp\u003e   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866130043160,"sku":"9781601569851","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true},{"title":"eBook","offer_id":46866130075928,"sku":"9798886143294","price":55.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true},{"title":"Audiobook Add-On (eBook Required)","offer_id":51501874905368,"sku":"9798899631955","price":33.99,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true},{"title":"eBook + Audiobook","offer_id":50801076109592,"sku":"9798899633034","price":92.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_f919d05d-abbf-4f35-8d5f-2e20a2f2165b.jpg?v=1780551233"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-bmivminicom11r-plaintiff","title":"BMI v. Minicom, Deposition File, Plaintiff’s Materials, Eleventh Edition","description":"\u003cp\u003e It’s David versus Goliath when computer giant BMI sues startup Minicom for damages when a shipment of components that BMI sent to Minicom is lost. BMI claims that Minicom bore the risk of loss; it is suing to recover for breach of contract. Minicom claims it directed BMI to obtain insurance on the shipment and that BMI’s failure to do so breached the contract, causing the loss of past and future profits. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e One of NITA’s most popular cases, this well-balanced file has been updated with electronic evidence. BMI provides ample material for basic and advanced advocacy training with two witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant in the deposition version. The trial version includes one optional economics expert for each side. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e BMI is available as a trial file, or as deposition files with Plaintiff, Defendant, and Faculty versions, each sold separately. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNew to the Revised 11th Edition: \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e Updated exhibits to correct dates and eliminate confusion \u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cb\u003eProfessors and students will benefit from:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cp\u003e   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A case file that can be used both for deposition practice and for mock trials \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A time-tested case file that has been updated to include electronic exhibits \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866130108696,"sku":"9781601569875","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_8ebc0ff5-31a3-4019-880d-8cf98a641207.jpg?v=1785734538"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-bmivminicom11r-trial","title":"BMI v. Minicom, Case File, Trial Materials, Eleventh Edition","description":"\u003cp\u003e It’s David versus Goliath when computer giant BMI sues startup Minicom for damages when a shipment of components that BMI sent to Minicom is lost. BMI claims that Minicom bore the risk of loss; it is suing to recover for breach of contract. Minicom claims it directed BMI to obtain insurance on the shipment and that BMI’s failure to do so breached the contract, causing the loss of past and future profits. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e One of NITA’s most popular cases, this well-balanced file has been updated with electronic evidence. BMI provides ample material for basic and advanced advocacy training with two witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant in the deposition version. The trial version includes one optional economics expert for each side. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e BMI is available as a trial file, or as deposition files with Plaintiff, Defendant, and Faculty versions, each sold separately. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNew to the Revised 11th Edition: \u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\u003cli\u003e Updated exhibits to correct dates and eliminate confusion \u003c\/li\u003e\u003c\/ul\u003e\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cb\u003eProfessors and students will benefit from:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003cp\u003e   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A case file that can be used both for deposition practice and for mock trials \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A time-tested case file that has been updated to include electronic exhibits \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e   \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866130141464,"sku":"9781601569837","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_1ef7ef9b-c16a-4bfb-a99d-275e6a1ea335.jpg?v=1785734537"},{"product_id":"nita-rothschild-brown2","title":"Brown v. Byrd: Case File, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eKenneth Brown claims he can't engage in any strenuous exercise and that a muscle relaxant his doctor prescribes does not allow him to drink any alcohol. Both of these inconveniences, Brown is convinced, is a result of being rear-ended by the defendant, Robert Byrd, and Brown is suing to recover damages for neck, back, and closed-head injuries. However, Brown has been observed exercising and drinking alcohol. Byrd maintains that the collision was in no way serious enough to cause Brown's alleged injuries. There are two witnesses for both the plaintiff and the defendant in this personal injury case file.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866130338072,"sku":"9781601562203","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_075dbe77-5e84-4416-887e-a6ef8f71fbc0.jpg?v=1785734504"},{"product_id":"nita_chen_v_miller","title":"Chen v. Miller, First Edition","description":"\u003cp\u003e The rushed days of two people collided with calamitous results when Taylor Chen, who was walking in a crosswalk, was struck by a car driven by Alex Miller, a KarPül driver on the way to pick up a rideshare customer. Chen has brought a negligence action for personal injury damages against Miller and claims that Miller disregarded traffic lights and failed to yield. Miller claims to have had the right-of-way and that Chen stepped into the street without paying attention to traffic while texting. Who is at fault, and how much damage did Chen really suffer? You must persuade the jury when you try this case. Compact yet thorough, this case file addresses multiple issues of modern evidence and witness examination skills. \u003c\/p\u003e\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eProfessors and students will benefit from:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A timeline that helps participants quickly absorb the materials \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Electronic evidence including text messaging and social media \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Downloadable color versions of exhibits \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A limited number of gender-neutral witnesses \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866136531224,"sku":"9798886690194","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_8e1d0515-db34-4581-8db8-7306c493f654.jpg?v=1785734867"},{"product_id":"nita-bailey-constantine3","title":"Constantine v. Prince: Case File, Trial Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e Bike messenger George Constantine died after being struck by motorist Richard Prince—this is not in doubt. The question is, was Prince driving distracted when his car hit Constantine? Or did Constantine ride into the path of a car too close to stop? This robust case, based on a real-life incident, provides a multitude of evidence types, including computer animations, social media, text messaging, and business documents, as well as expert witnesses for both accident reconstruction and damages. Participants will have access to color exhibits and animations via our download center. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNew to the Third Edition:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Innovative juror engagement visual strategies \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Analysis of internet related changes in juror brain function and attention span \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Text messaging\/distracted driving images \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Social media and Google Maps visuals \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Computer screen evidence simulations \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Visualizations streamlining expert testimony \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eProfessors and students will benefit from:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e The modern approach, geared to advocacy in the internet era \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Highly sophisticated computer graphics \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Unparalleled visual advocacy opportunities \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Exciting motion practice and evidentiary foundation challenges \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e A realistic scenario based on an actual wrongful death trial \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e The balanced fact pattern, with each side having an equal opportunity to win \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e The flexibility to try the case as liability only or liability and damages \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866142396696,"sku":"9781601568960","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_10efc6d8-1efe-4560-b934-443a50f7689c.jpg?v=1785734538"},{"product_id":"nita-burns-cranbrookedefendant4","title":"Cranbrooke v. Intellex: Defendant's Materials, Fourth Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntellex, an ambitious US video game company, comes into conflict with Cranbrooke, a traditional manufacturer of children’s games for the European market. Their dispute? The terms of a contract for Cranbrooke to license and manufacture Intellex’s newest virtual reality system. Cranbrooke claims that the new system is an improvement over the original system and therefore covered by the terms of the contract and that it has the exclusive right to distribute Intellex's virtual reality products in the European Union for at least five years. Intellex counters that the new system is no more an “improvement” than compact discs were merely an improvement on phonograph records and that Cranbrooke’s contract only provided a first right of refusal on innovative new products. At stake are distribution rights for the improved system throughout the European Union.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fourth edition of \u003ci\u003eCranbrooke\u003c\/i\u003e is a substantial update over previous versions. The Cranbrooke offices have been moved to fictional Brittania to avoid any Brexit conflicts. Exhibits have been updated to reflect modern business practices, including text messaging. Expert witness reports have been updated to reflect more realistic pricing. And the game system in dispute has been modernized.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis international contract case file provides the flexibility that you’ve been looking for. It comes in formats that can be used as a fact investigation file, a deposition file, or trial file on liability or damages or both. The Trial file contains all witness depositions and documents. The Deposition versions reflect the reality of deposition practice, when each party only has certain documents: the Plaintiff file contains materials only available to the plaintiff side to aid in prepping for depositions; the Defendant file contains materials only available to defendants; the Faculty file contains both the plaintiff and defendant material and is for instructor use. The plaintiff and defendant each have three witnesses, including accounting experts for each side.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866149769496,"sku":"9781601569080","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_6472a589-849c-4431-a49d-05e5999e8f76.jpg?v=1785734542"},{"product_id":"nita-burns-cranbrookefaculty4","title":"Cranbrooke v. Intellex: Faculty Materials, Fourth Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntellex, an ambitious US video game company, comes into conflict with Cranbrooke, a traditional manufacturer of children’s games for the European market. Their dispute? The terms of a contract for Cranbrooke to license and manufacture Intellex’s newest virtual reality system. Cranbrooke claims that the new system is an improvement over the original system and therefore covered by the terms of the contract and that it has the exclusive right to distribute Intellex's virtual reality products in the European Union for at least five years. Intellex counters that the new system is no more an “improvement” than compact discs were merely an improvement on phonograph records and that Cranbrooke’s contract only provided a first right of refusal on innovative new products. At stake are distribution rights for the improved system throughout the European Union.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fourth edition of \u003ci\u003eCranbrooke\u003c\/i\u003e is a substantial update over previous versions. The Cranbrooke offices have been moved to fictional Brittania to avoid any Brexit conflicts. Exhibits have been updated to reflect modern business practices, including text messaging. Expert witness reports have been updated to reflect more realistic pricing. And the game system in dispute has been modernized.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis international contract case file provides the flexibility that you’ve been looking for. It comes in formats that can be used as a fact investigation file, a deposition file, or trial file on liability or damages or both. The Trial file contains all witness depositions and documents. The Deposition versions reflect the reality of deposition practice, when each party only has certain documents: the Plaintiff file contains materials only available to the plaintiff side to aid in prepping for depositions; the Defendant file contains materials only available to defendants; the Faculty file contains both the plaintiff and defendant material and is for instructor use. The plaintiff and defendant each have three witnesses, including accounting experts for each side.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866149802264,"sku":"9781601569042","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_08dccaf3-1b50-4398-89a9-10c87cdae414.jpg?v=1785734541"},{"product_id":"nita-burns-cranbrookeintlclaimant","title":"Cranbrooke v. Intellex, International Arbitration Version: Claimant Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eAn international contractual dispute arises when Intellex, a U.S. manufacturer of video games, licenses another company to distribute its newly developed line of video-game products in possible violation of its contract with Cranbrooke, a British manufacturer and distributor of leisure products that had the exclusive right to distribute Intellex's video-game products in the European Union for at least five years. Designed to be tried on liability or damages or both, this file provides the flexibility and content you've been looking for. The plaintiff and defendant each have three witnesses, including accounting experts for each side.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866149835032,"sku":"9781601567079","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_751965d4-071b-450d-ae52-6c0562d017c4.jpg?v=1785734497"},{"product_id":"nita-burns-cranbrookeintlfaculty","title":"Cranbrooke v. Intellex, International Arbitration Version: Faculty Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eAn international contractual dispute arises when Intellex, a U.S. manufacturer of video games, licenses another company to distribute its newly developed line of video-game products in possible violation of its contract with Cranbrooke, a British manufacturer and distributor of leisure products that had the exclusive right to distribute Intellex's video-game products in the European Union for at least five years. Designed to be tried on liability or damages or both, this file provides the flexibility and content you've been looking for. The plaintiff and defendant each have three witnesses, including accounting experts for each side.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866149900568,"sku":"9781601565655","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_0954cfd0-7155-4e1f-be65-822170e09529.jpg?v=1785734511"},{"product_id":"nita-burns-cranbrookeintlrespondent","title":"Cranbrooke v. Intellex, International Arbitration Version: Respondent Materials, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eAn international contractual dispute arises when Intellex, a U.S. manufacturer of video games, licenses another company to distribute its newly developed line of video-game products in possible violation of its contract with Cranbrooke, a British manufacturer and distributor of leisure products that had the exclusive right to distribute Intellex's video-game products in the European Union for at least five years. Designed to be tried on liability or damages or both, this file provides the flexibility and content you've been looking for. The plaintiff and defendant each have three witnesses, including accounting experts for each side.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866149933336,"sku":"9781601567086","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_5b62f355-9e2c-4f61-97fd-7535e2e0c407.jpg?v=1785734498"},{"product_id":"nita-burns-cranbrookeplaintiff4","title":"Cranbrooke v. Intellex: Plaintiff's Materials, Fourth Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntellex, an ambitious US video game company, comes into conflict with Cranbrooke, a traditional manufacturer of children’s games for the European market. Their dispute? The terms of a contract for Cranbrooke to license and manufacture Intellex’s newest virtual reality system. Cranbrooke claims that the new system is an improvement over the original system and therefore covered by the terms of the contract and that it has the exclusive right to distribute Intellex's virtual reality products in the European Union for at least five years. Intellex counters that the new system is no more an “improvement” than compact discs were merely an improvement on phonograph records and that Cranbrooke’s contract only provided a first right of refusal on innovative new products. At stake are distribution rights for the improved system throughout the European Union.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fourth edition of \u003ci\u003eCranbrooke\u003c\/i\u003e is a substantial update over previous versions. The Cranbrooke offices have been moved to fictional Brittania to avoid any Brexit conflicts. Exhibits have been updated to reflect modern business practices, including text messaging. Expert witness reports have been updated to reflect more realistic pricing. And the game system in dispute has been modernized.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis international contract case file provides the flexibility that you’ve been looking for. It comes in formats that can be used as a fact investigation file, a deposition file, or trial file on liability or damages or both. The Trial file contains all witness depositions and documents. The Deposition versions reflect the reality of deposition practice, when each party only has certain documents: the Plaintiff file contains materials only available to the plaintiff side to aid in prepping for depositions; the Defendant file contains materials only available to defendants; the Faculty file contains both the plaintiff and defendant material and is for instructor use. The plaintiff and defendant each have three witnesses, including accounting experts for each side.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866149966104,"sku":"9781601569066","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_d5dfba61-9486-4771-a9a6-863666376113.jpg?v=1785734540"},{"product_id":"nita-burns-cranbrooketrial4","title":"Cranbrooke v. Intellex: Case File, Fourth Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eIntellex, an ambitious US video game company, comes into conflict with Cranbrooke, a traditional manufacturer of children’s games for the European market. Their dispute? The terms of a contract for Cranbrooke to license and manufacture Intellex’s newest virtual reality system. Cranbrooke claims that the new system is an improvement over the original system and therefore covered by the terms of the contract and that it has the exclusive right to distribute Intellex's virtual reality products in the European Union for at least five years. Intellex counters that the new system is no more an “improvement” than compact discs were merely an improvement on phonograph records and that Cranbrooke’s contract only provided a first right of refusal on innovative new products. At stake are distribution rights for the improved system throughout the European Union.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe fourth edition of \u003ci\u003eCranbrooke\u003c\/i\u003e is a substantial update over previous versions. The Cranbrooke offices have been moved to fictional Brittania to avoid any Brexit conflicts. Exhibits have been updated to reflect modern business practices, including text messaging. Expert witness reports have been updated to reflect more realistic pricing. And the game system in dispute has been modernized.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis international contract case file provides the flexibility that you’ve been looking for. It comes in formats that can be used as a fact investigation file, a deposition file, or trial file on liability or damages or both. The Trial file contains all witness depositions and documents. The Deposition versions reflect the reality of deposition practice, when each party only has certain documents: the Plaintiff file contains materials only available to the plaintiff side to aid in prepping for depositions; the Defendant file contains materials only available to defendants; the Faculty file contains both the plaintiff and defendant material and is for instructor use. The plaintiff and defendant each have three witnesses, including accounting experts for each side.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866149998872,"sku":"9781601569028","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_1d3707c5-7004-48dc-a34f-d62bdf998d10.jpg?v=1785734540"},{"product_id":"nita-rich-crimlawcollection","title":"Criminal Law Collection: Condensed Case Files: State v. Edwards, State v. Chapman, State v. Cunningham, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eIn State v. Chapman, a police officer faces murder charges after an elderly woman is found dead in her car. Chapman maintains his innocence, and insists that detectives, protecting another police officer who committed suicide days after the murder occurred, are setting him up.  In State v. Edwards, Michael Edwards, who is serving time for car theft, is accused of murdering a pawn shop owner. Edwards insists he couldn't have committed the murder because it occurred on his birthday and he was with friends the entire day.  In State v. Cunningham, the defendant is charged with violating the Controlled Substance Act after he sells cocaine to an undercover police officer. The defendant, Richard Cunningham, claims he was the victim of police entrapment. The state claims that Cunningham was not entrapped, and freely sold drugs to the undercover police officer.  The three short yet complete case files in this criminal case file packet allow readers to try, review, and compare the cases in less time. They are perfect for courses in trial skills, trial practice, criminal litigation, and evidence handling, and will also work well in mock trials.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866150883608,"sku":"9781601563248","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true},{"title":"LLPOD","offer_id":46866150916376,"sku":"9798886149647","price":59.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true},{"title":"eBook","offer_id":46866150949144,"sku":"9781543844986","price":55.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true},{"title":"Audiobook Add-On (eBook Required)","offer_id":51501879918872,"sku":"9798899632051","price":33.99,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true},{"title":"eBook + Audiobook","offer_id":50805513027864,"sku":"9798899633515","price":92.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_16f77665-a448-402d-a0f5-4954afc1180c.jpg?v=1785734405"},{"product_id":"nita-amta-davis2","title":"Davis v. HappyLand Toy Company: Case File, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eJoey Davis was two years old when he died after swallowing beads from his sister's make-your-own jewelry set. Test revealed that Joey had elevated gamma-hydroxybutyric acid (GHB) levels in his system at the time of death and that the elevated GHB could have been a result of the chemicals used in the beads. Andy Davis, Joey's parent, has sued HappyLand Toy Company for strict liability, claiming that the beads were defectively designed. HappyLand Toy Company denies that its beads were defectively designed and has also asserted an affirmative defense of comparative fault, claiming that the negligence and\/or recklessness of Andy Davis and\/or Joey's babysitter was more responsible than HappyLand Toy Company for Joey's death.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866157764888,"sku":"9781601565020","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_d864a170-f0e2-4375-b017-1a89ffef2889.jpg?v=1785734503"},{"product_id":"nita-stein-dixon7","title":"Dixon v. Providential Life Insurance Co.: Case File, Seventh Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eWhen Judge John Dixon was found on the floor of his home office with a gunshot wound to the head, there was no question of foul play. Behind the locked door of his office, Judge Dixon shot himself with favorite shotgun. The only question is, was this an accident—or suicide? Plaintiff Mary Dixon demands that Providential Life Insurance Company pay on her husband’s $1 million life insurance policy, taken out shortly before his death. Providential refuses, citing the suicide provision of the policy. The medical examiner determined the death was accidental, but Providential claims the medical examiner's conclusion was tainted by his friendship with the judge and a hasty investigation, and that Dixon's death was, in fact, a suicide. Would this seemingly happy, well-respected judge to kill himself? Was Judge Dixon the churchgoing social conservative that his public persona suggested? Did his shotgun accidentally discharge while he, an experienced hunter and gun owner, was cleaning it in a darkened room—or was he troubled by a secret that was about to be exposed and made suicide seem like his only way out? This well-balanced file challenges advocates for both the plaintiff and the defendant. Programs using it see equal numbers of verdicts for both the plaintiff and the defense. There are five witnesses for the plaintiff and four for the defendant. Dixon v. Providential Life Insurance Company has a courtroom technology focus and includes electronic evidence in the form of photographs, diagrams, documents, emails, and text messages. It includes a web link to color versions of all exhibits, the audio clip of Mary Dixon’s 911 call, and deposition video clips to use for impeachment purposes. The Seventh Edition is based on the original case file by James H. Seckinger, as updated and upgraded by Edward R. Stein and Frank D. Rothschild.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866159567128,"sku":"9781601567994","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_5811363c-2533-4c44-81f8-8fa081c0ae72.jpg?v=1785734576"},{"product_id":"nita-lippy-evansvnitastate2","title":"Evans v. Nita State University: Case File, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThey sure don’t make schoolyard bullies the way they used to. Just ask Riley Evans, the college coed in\u003ci\u003e\u003cb\u003e Evans v. Nita State University\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/i\u003e who became the target of Facebook attacks while running for “president” in a mock election class at Nita State University.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe simulated campaign took an ugly personal turn when Evans’s opponent used social media to attack Evans the college student rather than Evans the mock candidate, and posted inflammatory allegations that Evans was a cheat, a bigot, and a boozer. Evans filed a civil lawsuit alleging that the university failed to provide a safe learning environment and did not prevent hostile cyberbullying\u003cbr\u003e that substantially interfered with Evans’s education.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis case file, formerly titled \u003ci\u003eEvans v. Washingtonia State University\u003c\/i\u003e, refines the student’s advocacy and examination skills through this full trial—which includes depositions and electronic evidence in the form of emails, text messages, a video clip, and social media posts—and focuses on storytelling as it relates to presenting factual information to judges and juries. The second edition presents new additions to the depositions, updated jury instructions, a reorganized format, and a fresheningup to the narrative that makes note of the current political atmosphere.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866171658520,"sku":"9781601568014","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_bf544263-4bbd-4dd2-852f-8e9ab387c0b3.jpg?v=1721288886"},{"product_id":"nita-rose-fitzgerald5","title":"Fitzgerald v. Nita and Western Railroad: Case File, Fifth Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eJohnny Fitzgerald died after his vehicle collided with a train. Was Johnny at fault? Did he intentionally drive is car into the train? Or was the railroad negligent in not providing adequate warnings at the crossing and in the operation of the train? Students can test their skills in this wrongful death case file that can be used as a comparative negligence trial file, a negotiation file, or a fact investigation file. There are five witnesses for each party, including engineering and economic experts.    The Fifth Edition includes the addition of an economic expert witness for the defense, and a text message exhibit.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866191057176,"sku":"9781601564801","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_37915a83-36d3-42cb-a50e-52ac28d627c1.jpg?v=1785734500"},{"product_id":"nita-sitterly-flinders11","title":"Flinders Aluminum Fabrication Corporation v. Mismo Fire Insurance Company: Case File,  Trial Materials, Eleventh Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e When the Flinders Aluminum Fabrication Corporation burns to the ground, killing George Avery, suspicion falls on CEO Arthur Jackson. In fact, Mismo Fire Insurance Company is so certain that the fire was deliberately set that it has denied the insurance claim. Jackson, the sole stockholder in the financially troubled corporation, has filed a civil action to recover damages against Mismo for the denied claim. Mismo asserts that Jackson conspired with others to burn the plant in order to fraudulently collect the insurance policy. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e Did we mention that the deceased Avery is a suspected “torch,” implicated in the burning of two other commercial buildings in Nita City? That reputation isn’t helping Jackson’s case, but he claims he hired Avery, a talented designer, to help him modernize the Flinders plant. The intrigue grows when it is revealed that one of the witnesses against Jackson has a serious axe to grind that could be clouding her vision. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e This entertaining file presents a well-balanced case that can be also tried as a condensed or an advanced experience. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNew to the Eleventh Edition:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Electronic media exhibits \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Sparky the arson dog \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e New financial parameters \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eProfessors and students will benefit from:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Video depositions \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e The flexibility to use this file as either a brief or an extended exercise \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Experiential learning opportunities \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cli\u003e Impeachment exercises \u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866191089944,"sku":"9781601569462","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_39430695-cefd-4a6c-a568-fb860a2746a5.jpg?v=1785734530"},{"product_id":"nita-rose-fordyce7","title":"Fordyce v. Harris and Nelson: Case File, Seventh Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e Henry Fordyce and Eva Marie Long were having drinks in a bar. Fordyce claims that Harris and Felson were leering at and making insulting comments about Long, and when Fordyce confronted Harris and Felson, the three men got into a fight. After the police broke up the fight and all parties had left the bar, Fordyce claims that he was jumped in an alley and beaten by Harris and Felson. Fordyce was hospitalized with a fractured skull, but has fully recovered. He is suing for his medical expenses and lost wages. Defendants deny assaulting Fordyce in the alley, claiming he started the fight in the bar and after the police broke it up, they drove directly to Felson’s motel.  \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e Updated to reflect current monetary amounts, text messaging, and issues regarding evidence-gathering and chain of custody, this case file is designed to be used in a trial advocacy program as skill exercises or a final trial—or both. In addition, along with its companion file, \u003ci\u003eState v. Harris\u003c\/i\u003e, it can be effectively used to highlight the differences between civil and criminal advocacy techniques. Exhibits, diagrams, and police reports have been updated. Four new exhibits have been added, including photos of the weapon and a forensic evidence report. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e There are four witnesses for each side, no experts. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866191581464,"sku":"9781601568786","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_aa216ba9-f7f2-4df1-b72f-d3d703f71a18.jpg?v=1747292718"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-friscovblenheim","title":"Frisco Farm Corp. v. Blenheim Markets: Case File, Trial Materials, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eAn apple a day certainly won’t keep the lawyers away. Produce broker Frisco Farm Corporation sold 25,000 pounds of apples to Blenheim Markets, with a contract clause stating that Blenheim could cancel the order within three business days. Blenheim tried to exercise that clause, but their email went astray. The apples were delivered, a thunderstorm destroyed most of the crop, and each of the parties believes the other is responsible for the loss. \u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThis short trial file revolves around two basic questions: what a contract is, and what constitutes a business day. The facts of the case are straightforward, and a variety of exhibits provide ample opportunity for evidence practice. The trial can be run in a single day, making this an attractive case for shorter programs. With four witnesses and a choice to try for either liability or damages, Frisco v. Blenheim is adaptable to your classroom needs.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866192728344,"sku":"9781601569387","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_76a88307-0441-4fbc-971e-e0a6eef7db23.jpg?v=1785734546"},{"product_id":"nita-bailey-garcia2","title":"Garcia v. Vertex Manufacturing Company: Case File, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eIn this products-liability case involving the tip-over of an extended-reach personnel lift, a shipyard worker falls seventy feet when the lift he's in tips over. He suffers broken ankles in the fall and claims that he sustained a closed head injury. He sues Vertex Manufacturing, the maker of the lift, claiming negligent design. Experts will testify for both sides on the lift's design safety and industry standards. The defendant alleges that the lift was within industry standards and that it tipped over because of the plaintiff's employer's failure to properly train its workers. Defendant also disputes plaintiff's claims of a head injury and personality change. If tried for liability only, there are three witnesses for the plaintiff and two for the defense. If damages are pursued, then there are five witnesses for the plaintiff and three for the defense.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866195022104,"sku":"9781601561077","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_220225d6-333b-4daf-a72a-eb048ea06db7.jpg?v=1785734500"},{"product_id":"nita-broun-green6","title":"Green v. Hall and Rose: Case File, Sixth Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eInitially designed as a case file for a fair housing clinic, Green v. Hall and Rose is an excellent case file not only for fair housing study but also racial discrimination. With special emphasis on discovery exercises, this case file focuses on Richard and Martha Green's trouble with buying a home in the Beverly Hills area of Nita City. The Greens allege that homeowner and defendant, Elizabeth Hall, refused an offer made by the Green's realtor, Sylvia Rose, because of the Green's race. There are two witnesses for the plaintiff and four witnesses for the defendants including an expert real estate appraiser and an expert medical psychiatrist.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866197905688,"sku":"9781556815485","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_3f51d8bb-cde5-4435-8062-63fb2f426d0c.jpg?v=1785734511"},{"product_id":"nita-jones-huntington","title":"Huntington v. Aster: Case File, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eRose Huntington, the plaintiff, is suing Mark Aster, the defendant, for professional negligence, breach of fiduciary duty, conversion, and set aside of irrevocable trust. Mark helped April, Rose's daughter, convert Rose's will into an irrevocable trust. The trust named April as the sole trustee over Rose's 1.5 million dollar estate. Rose alleges that she didn't fully understand the terms of the trust when she signed it, and that Mark failed to fully explain the trust's conditions to her.  April invested half of Rose's estate into two Peruvian development projects. April and Mark then traveled to Peru to discuss the investments. During the trip April disappeared while scuba diving with Mark. The Peruvian police were unable to determine the cause of her disappearance. Mark Aster denies involvement in both April's decision to invest in the Peruvian projects and her disappearance.  This complex case file will challenge students and professors. April Huntington's disappearance adds another dimension to this case, allowing students to argue their position from several angles. There are comprehensive exhibits and four witnesses, including two estate law expert witnesses.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866200101144,"sku":"9781601563347","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_a6de0e0d-b1b1-4208-9e43-f8c6baf1b6f8.jpg?v=1785734507"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-inrecooperman3","title":"In re Cooperman: Professional Responsibility, Case File, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe Nita Bar Association has brought a four-count complaint against attorney Harriet Cooperman for violations of the disciplinary code. The Bar alleges that Cooperman failed to adequately consult with her client, David Engles, during the course of his action against the Acme Paper Company. The Bar also states: Cooperman failed to adequately explain the contents of her fee agreement; she represented clients with conflicting interests without first obtaining the informed consent; and finally, she represented a client against a former client in a cause of action.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe first edition of this case file won the ABA’s Gambrell Award for programming in the area of Professional Responsibility and Professionalism. The new edition adds social media evidence, giving students a richer opportunity to introduce and refer to exhibits. The case contains two lay witnesses and one expert for each party, making it a concise case file for teaching.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cb\u003eNew to the Third Edition:\u003c\/b\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eChanged names of some of the witnesses to be more diverse and gender neutral\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cli\u003ePatricia Simpson ¿ Pat Simpson\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eJames Doran ¿ Jamie Doran\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eMary Gallo ¿ Cosme Gallo\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eHoward Marshall ¿ Nour Basara\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eAdded texts between Cooperman and her partner\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cli\u003eEdited mss to make the language more active and gender neutral\u003c\/li\u003e\n\u003c\/ul\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866200690968,"sku":"9781601568052","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_a31ee948-9e13-401f-8b61-7a0b81807be2.jpg?v=1785734578"},{"product_id":"nita-lore-inrelewis","title":"In re Lewis: Case File, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eIn In re Lewis, what started out as a fun Saturday among teenage buddies ends in the slammer, when Tony Lewis, Matty Smith, and Tony’s younger cousin Alex Duval are picked up by Nita City Police for conspiring to rob a convenience store at gunpoint. With Tony and Matty each having a history of juvenile delinquency, the stakes become high and each boy accuses the other of being the brains behind the heist. The State of Nita alleges that Tony committed robbery, theft, and trespassing—accusations buoyed by Matty’s own admission to theft and testimony implicating Tony and Alex in the robbery.   In re Lewis is designed to assist in the training of lawyers who work in juvenile court either prosecuting or defending children in delinquency matters. It can also be used as a bench trial for attorneys practicing in adult criminal court and a law school course in trial advocacy and juvenile law. To introduce more wrinkles into the case, professors may elect to teach supplemental detention materials on Tony Lewis, which include a report from Tony’s probation officer, school transcripts and suspension notices, and letters of character reference.   This case file refines the student’s advocacy and examination skills, and features four witnesses for the prosecution and three for the defense, police reports, photos, maps, and diagrams, as well as social media evidence in the form of posts to Facebook and Twitter that are accessible on online “microsites.”\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866200789272,"sku":"9781601561688","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_707a1f09-181e-4e81-aecc-3e5b48dab9b8.jpg?v=1785734500"},{"product_id":"nita-brooks-jones","title":"Jones v. Kids-R-Ours: Case File, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eAfter suffering a seizure at work, the plaintiff, Jean Jones, was suspended without pay from the Kids-R-Ours day care where she worked. Jones suffers from epilepsy, which is a qualified disability under the Americans with Disabilities Act. This, however, did not stop the defendant from suspending, demoting, and then firing the plaintiff. Kids-R-Ours claims that their action was justifiable since Jones was a threat to the children. This is a well-balanced file where the verdict could easily be won by either party. There are three witnesses for both plaintiff and defendant.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866213634328,"sku":"9781556814587","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":false}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_2177c080-2edb-4b67-926b-9c77c7897f1d.jpg?v=1785734511"},{"product_id":"nita-moore-kemper","title":"Kemper v. Nita City Cubs Holdings, Inc.: Case File, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eIn Kemper v. Nita City Cubs Holdings, Inc.,what began as a fun afternoon at the ballpark turned into a nightmare for a baseball patron and a lawsuit for the Nita City Cubs organization. The plaintiff, Jessica Kemper, sued the baseball stadium for injuries caused by an allegedly intoxicated fan at a game. Kemper alleged violations of the Nita Dram Shop Act and negligence.  Kemper was looking forward to a baseball game with her children at Hannigan Field, home of the Nita City Cubs. What she got instead was a trip to the emergency room, several stitches, and a lawsuit for the damages she incurred. A fellow sports fan, arguably intoxicated, threw a small bat he was given as part of the Souvenir Bat Giveaway promotion and struck Kemper in the back of the head.  Was this a simple case of drunken behavior, or an example of systemic, irresponsible revelry sanctioned, and even encouraged, by the Cubs organization? Did the Cubs sacrifice safety and security to drive up 'fun' at the park for all the wrong people? Either side can make a compelling case given the exhibits, testimony, and witnesses.  Kemper v. Nita City Cubs, the second in Theresa D. Moore's Trial by Fire™ legal case series, refines the student's advocacy and examination skills through this full trial, which includes two to four witnesses per side, mini depositions, and modern electronic evidence in the form of emails, Tweets, and photo-sharing posts that are accessible on online 'microsites.'  The case series focuses on storytelling as it relates to presenting factual information to judges and juries. Kemper is well balanced and can be won by either side. It has substantial evidentiary depth, which allows the students varying options of strategy and creativity for those who meet the challenge and see the hidden gems in the facts.  These cases, by their facts and evidence, are meant to inspire the imagination of the students, challenge them, and give them the will and desire to fight for their cause. Kemper features true-to-life evidence, documents, and situations, and is professor friendly, with teaching notes available.  And, the Nita City Cubs souvenir bat, physical evidence in the case, is also available for purchase.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866215665944,"sku":"9781601564863","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_316f27aa-bf64-4de4-ae3c-cac92ea104d5.jpg?v=1785734501"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-lang2","title":"Lang v. Anderson: Case File, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eThe Plaintiff, Jeffrey B. Lang, seeks to recover damages based upon a claim that the defendant, Jennifer L. Anderson, owner of Mr. Gatsby's Restaurant, by serving and selling alcoholic beverages to Butch Turner, caused the intoxication of Butch Turner, and that Butch Turner injured the plaintiff while in this intoxicated condition.  The defendant denies that, as a result of beer consumed at Mr. Gatsby's Restaurant, Butch Turner became intoxicated. The defendant claims that the plaintiff provoked the fight with Turner. The defendant asserts that she, therefore, is not liable for the plaintiff's injuries.  This file is intended to be used for a bench trial or a short jury trial. The trial may be limited to the issue of liability; however, adequate materials are included to allow the issue of damages to also be tried. Each side should be permitted to call only two witnesses.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866216517912,"sku":"9781556817410","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_ecb52092-2f4f-4750-a792-cc2a2d5800fd.jpg?v=1785734511"},{"product_id":"nita-moore-mcnamaravenergydynamics2","title":"McNamara v. Energy Dynamics, Inc.: Case File, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eA small local dairy farmer is pitted against a large energy company in this civil case for negligence. Energy Dynamics has developed a new chemical; this breakthrough unlocks precious resources, and untold millions of dollars, buried beneath a local community’s feet. But as local farmers like McNamara experience mysterious livestock deaths, will the breakthrough prove to be a dangerous breakout of a toxic chemical?\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003eThe \u003cb\u003esecond edition\u003c\/b\u003e of McNamara introduces additional media evidence to challenge students. Witnesses include a veterinarian, chemists, community members, and executives. Exhibits include electronic evidence of emails, mini depositions, pictures, press releases, transcripts of Town Hall meeting, Facebook posts on online “microsites,” as well as impeachment material for teams to strategically choose what to emphasize or downplay. The case is limited to four witnesses, for an efficient deposition or trial experience, but there is a rich variety of material to mine in this entertaining case file.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003e\u003cbr\u003eAnother entry in Theresa D. Moore’s Trial by Fire® legal case series of well balanced cases, with modern facts and evidence meant to ignite in students the passion to vigorously fight for their client. McNamara’s unique issues of the environment and public policy encourage participants to consider storytelling aspects of presenting technical information drawing decision-makers into a human understanding of events and scientific issues.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866226512152,"sku":"9781601568359","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_f6319526-225a-4360-9d47-22b67ee2e6bb.jpg?v=1785734531"},{"product_id":"nita-wattley-mrs","title":"MRS v. Riverboat Queen: Case File, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eA popular tourist boat mysteriously sinks into Beacon Lake three days before the boat's insurance policy is due to expire. The boat's owner, Fred Glenn, hires Marine Rescue and Salvage (MRS) to haul the boat out of the lake. MRS fails to successfully raise the boat, and a dispute arises between Glenn and MRS. The Riverboat Queen had been docked at a boat ramp owned and operated by Nita City, who has chosen to terminate Glenn's lease. Why did the boat sink? Was the insurance policy going to be renewed? Who is responsible for the costs incurred as MRS tried to raise the boat? Is Nita City justified in terminating Glenn's lease?  The Riverboat Queen Case Files include four lawsuits drawn from the same fact pattern: three civil and one criminal. Because professors won't have to present new fact patterns for each case file, students can focus on examining the cases based on facts they already know, maximizing skills development and trial practice opportunities. The case files topics include a contract dispute and counterclaim, bad faith denial of an insurance claim and breach of contract, breach of contract landlord\/tenant, and attempted insurance fraud. This dynamic case file compilation includes over fifty exhibits, including diagrams, emails, and photographs, as well as evidentiary issues such as hearsay and business records exceptions.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866229854488,"sku":"9781601563361","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_abb1373d-e748-4bba-b0fc-a4e0cc0e8e5e.jpg?v=1785734512"},{"product_id":"nita-bocchino-nitafire2","title":"Nita Fire v. Rubino: Case File, Second Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003eThe plaintiff, Nita Fire and Casualty Company, brought this lawsuit to recover an amount paid to the defendant, Anthony J. Rubino, on a fire insurance policy on Rubino's business. Rubino was doing business as Rubino and Son, Dry Cleaners. A fire at the defendant's plant resulted in a total loss. The fire marshal determined that the fire was caused by spontaneous combustion. Relying on the report of the fire marshal, the plaintiff paid the defendant's claim in the amount of $300,000.00. After paying the claim, the plaintiff learned from a former employee of the defendant that the fire possibly was caused by arson. After it conducted an independent investigation, the plaintiff decided that the fire was set deliberately. Rubino has denied the allegation of arson.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866231787800,"sku":"9781556810657","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_4cff86ed-a84a-4cb8-8f89-29c2757feb0f.jpg?v=1785734509"},{"product_id":"nita-cloud-paulvdynamo-materialsfora-3e","title":"Paul v. Dynamo Sporting Goods, Dillon, and Hanson: A Motion Practice Case Study, Materials for A's, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen two entrepreneurs clash over women’s sportswear, the spandex flies. Michelle Paul sold her start-up company, Sportslifeware, to Arthur Dillon for $6 million. Dillon paid the first $500,000 at closing, but failed to pay the remaining $5.5 million when it was due. Paul is suing for that sum, but Dillon claims that Paul breached their contract by starting Sportique, a new sportswear company and luring away two of her former employees. Worse, one of the employees brought along the highly confidential customer list—one of Sportslifeware’s most valued assets. Dillon is countersuing for the damage he alleges Paul inflicted when she breached the contract.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe third edition of this popular casefile introduces Internet and social media exhibits, and updates the exhibits for a real world feel. \u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003ePaul v. Dynamo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e focuses on motion practice, an expanding portion of all law suits, and frequently the work that resolves a case. Self-encapsulated, with all the legal research participants need included in the book, \u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003ePaul v. Dynamo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e teaches students fact-finding, researching, and writing motions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866234081560,"sku":"9781601567499","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_5df4b352-a218-4d39-bcf5-467699470c5e.jpg?v=1785734503"},{"product_id":"nita-cloud-paulb3","title":"Paul v. Dynamo Sporting Goods, Dillon, and Hanson: A Motion Practice Case Study, Materials for B's, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen two entrepreneurs clash over women’s sportswear, the spandex flies. Michelle Paul sold her start-up company, Sportslifeware, to Arthur Dillon for $6 million. Dillon paid the first $500,000 at closing, but failed to pay the remaining $5.5 million when it was due. Paul is suing for that sum, but Dillon claims that Paul breached their contract by starting Sportique, a new sportswear company and luring away two of her former employees. Worse, one of the employees brought along the highly confidential customer list—one of Sportslifeware’s most valued assets. Dillon is countersuing for the damage he alleges Paul inflicted when she breached the contract.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe third edition of this popular casefile introduces Internet and social media exhibits, and updates the exhibits for a real world feel. \u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003ePaul v. Dynamo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e focuses on motion practice, an expanding portion of all law suits, and frequently the work that resolves a case. Self-encapsulated, with all the legal research participants need included in the book, \u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003ePaul v. Dynamo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e teaches students fact-finding, researching, and writing motions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866234376472,"sku":"9781601567512","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_d6ae4a7a-68ae-487d-957d-23afafde377b.jpg?v=1785734504"},{"product_id":"nita-cloud-paulfaculty3","title":"Paul v. Dynamo Sporting Goods, Dillon, and Hanson: A Motion Practice Case Study, Materials for Faculty, Third Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eWhen two entrepreneurs clash over women’s sportswear, the spandex flies. Michelle Paul sold her start-up company, Sportslifeware, to Arthur Dillon for $6 million. Dillon paid the first $500,000 at closing, but failed to pay the remaining $5.5 million when it was due. Paul is suing for that sum, but Dillon claims that Paul breached their contract by starting Sportique, a new sportswear company and luring away two of her former employees. Worse, one of the employees brought along the highly confidential customer list—one of Sportslifeware’s most valued assets. Dillon is countersuing for the damage he alleges Paul inflicted when she breached the contract.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003cp\u003eThe third edition of this popular casefile introduces Internet and social media exhibits, and updates the exhibits for a real world feel. \u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003ePaul v. Dynamo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e focuses on motion practice, an expanding portion of all law suits, and frequently the work that resolves a case. Self-encapsulated, with all the legal research participants need included in the book, \u003cb\u003e\u003ci\u003ePaul v. Dynamo\u003c\/i\u003e\u003c\/b\u003e teaches students fact-finding, researching, and writing motions.\u003c\/p\u003e\n\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866234507544,"sku":"9781601567536","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_bafacdad-ef96-446b-a239-29c4186a1057.jpg?v=1785734504"},{"product_id":"nita-leach-peters","title":"Peters v. Denver: Case File, First Edition","description":"\u003cdiv\u003ePeters v. Denver is a civil action charging legal malpractice on the part of attorney D.C. Denver. Paul Peters was tried and convicted on charges of aggravated battery and attempted murder. Along with his co-defendant, Carl Chastis, Peters was co-represented by Denver the time of their arrest through verdict. Neither defendant testified in the criminal trial. Instead, the defense offered aggressive cross-examination of the State’s witnesses (both forensic and fact) and presented two alibi witnesses to testify that during the time period of the crime both Chastis and Peters had been at a social club playing poker. Nevertheless, both men were convicted on all charges and Peters received a prison sentence of life with parole after 20 years.  In this suit Peters charges that Denver provided his defense under an impermissible conflict of interest between his duties to the two criminal defendants, depriving Peters of proper representation and leading to his conviction. Defendant asserts that his conduct of the defense was proper in all respects, and that any conflicts were fully, knowingly, and permissibly waived by plaintiff.  Through the testimony of the parties and expert witnesses and the presentation of exhibits focused on the interaction between Peters and Denver, students will have the opportunity to analyze the duties of attorneys to their clients and pitfalls presented by those duties. This well-balanced case could go either way, and its ethics issues are a subject for challenging questions to witnesses as well as well-reasoned closing arguments.\u003c\/div\u003e","brand":"Aspen Publishing","offers":[{"title":"Print","offer_id":46866236113176,"sku":"9781601565716","price":74.0,"currency_code":"USD","in_stock":true}],"thumbnail_url":"\/\/cdn.shopify.com\/s\/files\/1\/0687\/3566\/4408\/files\/o_b679b0c2-a373-40f6-ae50-f46d40856513.jpg?v=1785734510"}],"url":"https:\/\/aspenpublishing.com\/collections\/nita-civil-procedure-case-files.oembed?page=5","provider":"Aspen Publishing","version":"1.0","type":"link"}